23-09-2016, 11:08 AM
1455804009-456.pdf (Size: 8.26 MB / Downloads: 6)
FOREWORD
This Indian Standard (Fourth Revision) was adopted by the Bureau of Indian Standards, after the draft finalixed
by the Cement and Concrete Sectional Committee had been approved by the Civil Engineering Division Council.
This standard was first published in 1953 under the title ‘Code of practice for plain and reinforced concrete for
general building construction’ and subsequently revised in 1957. The code was further revised in 1964 and
published under modified title ‘Code of practice for plain and reinforced concrete’, thus enlarging the scope of
use of this code to structures other than general building construction also. The third revision was published in
1978, and it included limit state approach to design. This is the fourth revision of the standard. This revision
was taken up with a view to keeping abreast with the rapid development in the field of concrete technology and
to bring in further modifications/improvements in the light of experience gained while using the earlier version
of the standard.
This revision incorporates a number of important changes. The major thrust in the revision is on the following
lines:
a) In recent years, durability of concrete structures have become the cause of concern to all concrete
technologists. This has led to the need to codify the durability requirements world over. In this revision
of the code, in order to introduce in-built protection from factors affecting a structure, earlier clause on
durability has been elaborated and a detailed clause covering different aspects of design of durable
structure has been incorporated.
b) Sampling and acceptance criteria for concrete have been revised. With tbis revision acceptance criteria
has been simplified in line with the provisions given in BS 5328 (Part 4):1990 ‘Concrete: Part 4
Specification for the procedures to be used in sampling, testing and assessing compliance of concrete’.
Some of the significant changes incorporated in Section 2 are as follows:
a)
b)
cl
d)
e)
0
8)
h)
j)
k)
All the three grades of ordinary Portland cement, namely 33 grade, 43 grade and 53 grade and sulphate
resisting Portland cement have been included in the list of types of cement used (in addition to other
types of cement).
The permissible limits for solids in water have been modified keeping in view the durability requirements.
The clause on admixtures has been modified in view of the availability of new types of admixtures
including superplasticixers.
In Table 2 ‘Grades of Concrete’, grades higher than M 40 have been included.
It has been recommended that minimum grade of concrete shall be not less than M 20 in reinforced
concrete work (see also 6.1.3).
The formula for estimation of modulus of elasticity of concrete has been revised.
In the absenceof proper correlation between compacting factor, vee-bee time and slump, workability
has now been specified only in terms of slump in line with the provisions in BS 5328 (Parts 1 to 4).
Durability clause has been enlarged to include detailed guidance concerning the factors affecting durability.
The table on ‘Environmental Exposure Conditions’ has been modified to include ‘very severe’ and
‘extreme’ exposure conditions. This clause also covers requirements for shape and size of member,
depth of concrete cover, concrete quality, requirement against exposure to aggressive chemical and sulphate
attack, minimum cement requirement and maximum water cement ratio, limits of chloride content, alkali
silica reaction, and importance of compaction, finishing and curing.
A clause on ‘Quality Assurance Measures’ has been incorporated to give due emphasis to good practices
of concreting.
Proper limits have been introduced on the accuracy of measuring equipments to ensure accurate batching
of concrete.
1
IS 456 : 2000
m) The clause on ‘Construction Joints’ has been modified.
n) The clause on ‘Inspection’ has been modified to give more emphasis on quality assurance.
The significant changes incorporated in Section 3 are as follows:
a)
b)
cl
4
e)
0
g)
h)
j)
Requirements for ‘Fire Resistance’ have been further detailed.
The figure for estimation of modification factor for tension reinforcement used in calculation of basic
values of span to effective depth to control the deflection of flexural member has been modified.
Recommendations regarding effective length of cantilever have been added.
Recommendations regarding deflection due to lateral loads have been added.
Recommendations for adjustments of support moments in restrained slabs have been included.
In the detemination of effective length of compression members, stability index has been introduced to
determine sway or no sway conditions.
Recommendations have been made for lap length of hooks for bars in direct tension and flexural tension.
Recommendations regarding strength of welds have been modified.
Recommendations regarding cover to reinforcement have been modified. Cover has been specified
based~on durability requirements for different exposure conditions. The term ‘nominal cover’ has been
introduced. The cover has now been specified based on durability requirement as well as for fite
requirements.
The significant change incorporated in Section 4 is the modification-of the clause on Walls. The modified clause
includes design of walls against horizontal shear.
In Section 5 on limit state method a new clause has been added for calculation of enhanced shear strength of
sections close to supports. Some modifications have also been made in the clause on Torsion. Formula for
calculation of crack width has been-added (separately given in Annex P).
Working stress method has now been given in Annex B so as to give greater emphasis to limit state design. In
this Annex, modifications regarding torsion and enhanced shear strength on the same lines as in Section 5 have
been made.
Whilst the common methods of design and construction have been covered in this code, special systems of
design and construction of any plain or reinforced concrete structure not covered by this code may be permitted
on production of satisfactory evidence regarding their adequacy and safety by analysis or test or both
(see 19).
In this code it has been assumed that the design of plain and reinforced cement concrete work is entrusted to a
qualified engineer and that the execution of cement concrete work is carried out under the direction of a qualified
and experienced supervisor.
In the formulation of this standard, assistance has been derived from the following publications:
BS 5328-z Part 1 : 1991 Concrete : Part 1 Guide to specifying concrete, British Standards Institution
BS 5328 : Part 2 : 1991 Concrete : Part 2 Methods for specifying concrete mixes, British Standards
Institution
BS 5328 : Part 3 : 1990 Concrete : Part 3 Specification for the procedures to be used in producing and
transporting concrete, British Standards Institution
BS 5328 : Part 4 : 1990 Concrete : Part 4 Specification for the procedures to be used in sampling, testing
and assessing compliance of concrete, British Standards Institution
BS 8110 : Part 1 : 1985 Structural use of concrete : Part 1 Code of practice for design and construction,
British Standards Institution
BS 8110 : Part 2 : 1985 Structural use of concrete : Part 2 Code of practice for special circumstances,
British Standards Institution
AC1 3 19 : 1989 Building code requirements for reinforced concrete, American Concrete Institute
AS 3600 : 1988 Concrete structures, Standards Association of Australia
2
IS 456 : 2000
DIN 1045 July 1988 Structural use of concrete, design and construction, Deutsches Institut fur Normung E.V.
CEB-FIP Model code 1990, Comite Euro - International Du Belon
The composition of the technical committee responsible for the formulation of this standard is given in
Annex H.
For the purpose of deciding whether a particular requirement of this standard is complied with, the final value,
observed or calculated, expressing the result of a test or analysis shall be rounded off in accordance with
IS 2 : 1960 ‘Rules for rounding off numerical values (revised)‘. The number of significant places retained in the
rounded off value should be the same as that of~the specified value in this standard.