20-07-2012, 03:06 PM
Nanoscience and nanotechnology: ethical, legal, social and environmental issues
[attachment=28210]
The present article attempts to understand the debate over nanoscience and nanotechnology regarding
its potential benefits to the society. One view in this debate is that nanoscience and nanotechnology
has a revolutionary potential and will have significant economic benefits, while the other view is
skeptical about its potential in the context of ethical, legal, social and environmental (ELSE) issues
and values such as equity and justice. In some developed countries, discussion on the ELSE issues of
nanoscience and nanotechnology has already begun. Hence, there is a need to take a cue from the
debate in the developed countries and focus our attention on these issues in the Indian context. The
ELSE issues should be addressed right from the beginning of the development of nanoscience and
nanotechnology, so that it is possible to make informed policy decisions.
Initiatives, potential applications and controversies
Nanoscience and nanotechnology is about the precise and
purposeful manipulation of matter at the atomic level.
Burgi and Pradeep4 provide a comprehensive account of
the development of nanotechnology. The modern conceptual
underpinning of nanoscience and nanotechnology
was laid by the physicist Richard Feynman (1959) in his
lecture ‘There is plenty of room at the bottom’5. The
scanning tunnelling microscope (STM), a novel measuring
instrument invented by Gerhard Binnig and Heinrich
Rohrer, who were awarded the Nobel Prize for their invention
in 1986, enabled scientists to ‘see’ matter at the
nanoscale and ‘manipulate’ matter at that level. This is an
example of a technology that played an important role in
opening up a new field of scientific inquiry.
Conclusion
Nanoscience and nanotechnology, like any other knowledge
and associated practices that were developed in the
past, is getting shaped by scientific, technological, economic
and cultural forces. Different sections – enthusiasts and
skeptics – of this new technology are engaged in a debate
about the degree of desirability of this technology from
different value-premises and interpretations of the new
technoscience. In the Western countries research on ELSE
dimensions of nanoscience and nanotechnology has been
recognized as a legitimate field of inquiry. Research on
social, economic, environmental and health effects of nanoscience
and nanotechnology, and risks associated with
this new technology and regulatory norms have been initiated
with adequate funding. In India, similar evaluations
of nanoscience and nanotechnology have not been taken
up yet. The nanoscience and nanotechnology community
in India, except a few members, does not seem to appreciate
the ELSE issues relating to nanotechnology adequately.
[attachment=28210]
The present article attempts to understand the debate over nanoscience and nanotechnology regarding
its potential benefits to the society. One view in this debate is that nanoscience and nanotechnology
has a revolutionary potential and will have significant economic benefits, while the other view is
skeptical about its potential in the context of ethical, legal, social and environmental (ELSE) issues
and values such as equity and justice. In some developed countries, discussion on the ELSE issues of
nanoscience and nanotechnology has already begun. Hence, there is a need to take a cue from the
debate in the developed countries and focus our attention on these issues in the Indian context. The
ELSE issues should be addressed right from the beginning of the development of nanoscience and
nanotechnology, so that it is possible to make informed policy decisions.
Initiatives, potential applications and controversies
Nanoscience and nanotechnology is about the precise and
purposeful manipulation of matter at the atomic level.
Burgi and Pradeep4 provide a comprehensive account of
the development of nanotechnology. The modern conceptual
underpinning of nanoscience and nanotechnology
was laid by the physicist Richard Feynman (1959) in his
lecture ‘There is plenty of room at the bottom’5. The
scanning tunnelling microscope (STM), a novel measuring
instrument invented by Gerhard Binnig and Heinrich
Rohrer, who were awarded the Nobel Prize for their invention
in 1986, enabled scientists to ‘see’ matter at the
nanoscale and ‘manipulate’ matter at that level. This is an
example of a technology that played an important role in
opening up a new field of scientific inquiry.
Conclusion
Nanoscience and nanotechnology, like any other knowledge
and associated practices that were developed in the
past, is getting shaped by scientific, technological, economic
and cultural forces. Different sections – enthusiasts and
skeptics – of this new technology are engaged in a debate
about the degree of desirability of this technology from
different value-premises and interpretations of the new
technoscience. In the Western countries research on ELSE
dimensions of nanoscience and nanotechnology has been
recognized as a legitimate field of inquiry. Research on
social, economic, environmental and health effects of nanoscience
and nanotechnology, and risks associated with
this new technology and regulatory norms have been initiated
with adequate funding. In India, similar evaluations
of nanoscience and nanotechnology have not been taken
up yet. The nanoscience and nanotechnology community
in India, except a few members, does not seem to appreciate
the ELSE issues relating to nanotechnology adequately.