Seminar Topics & Project Ideas On Computer Science Electronics Electrical Mechanical Engineering Civil MBA Medicine Nursing Science Physics Mathematics Chemistry ppt pdf doc presentation downloads and Abstract

Full Version: TOPOLOGY CONTROL IN MOBILE AD HOC NETWORKS WITH COOPERATIVE COMMUNICATIONS REPORT
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
TOPOLOGY CONTROL IN MOBILE AD HOC NETWORKS WITH COOPERATIVE COMMUNICATIONS



[attachment=53276]

Abstract:

Cooperative communication has received tremendous interest for wireless networks.Most existing works on cooperative communications are focused on link-level physicallayer issues. Consequently, the impacts of cooperative communications on network-levelupper layer issues, such as topology control, routing and network capacity, are largely ignored. In this article, we propose a Capacity-Optimized Cooperative (COCO) topology control scheme to improve the network capacity in MANETs by jointly considering both upper layer network capacity and physical layer cooperative communications. Through simulations, we show that physical layer cooperative communications have significant impacts on the network capacity, and the proposed topology control scheme can substantially improve the network capacity in MANETs with cooperative communications.

Topology Capacity-Optimized Cooperative (COCO):

A Capacity-Optimized Cooperative (COCO) topology control scheme to improve the network capacity in MANETs by jointly optimizing transmission mode selection, relay node selection, and interference control in MANETs with cooperative communications. Through simulations, we show that physical layer cooperative communications have significant impacts on the network capacity, and the proposed topology control scheme can substantially improve the network capacity in MANETs with cooperative communications.

Existing System:

Most existing works are focused on link-level physical layer issues, such as outage probability and outage capacity. Consequently, the impacts of cooperative communications on network-level upper layer issues, such as topology control, routing and network capacity, are largely ignored. Indeed, most of current works on wireless networks attempt to create, adapt, and manage a network on a maze of point-to-point non-cooperative wireless links. Such architectures can be seen as complex networks of simple links.

Proposed System:

We propose a Capacity-Optimized Cooperative (COCO) topology control scheme to improve the network capacity in MANETs by jointly considering both upper layer network capacity and physical layer cooperative communications. Through simulations, we show that physical layer cooperative communications have significant impacts on the network capacity, and the proposed topology control scheme can substantially improve the network capacity in MANETs with cooperative communications.

Transmission in MANETs:

With physical layer cooperative communications, there are three transmission manners in MANETs: direct transmissions, multi-hop transmissions and cooperative transmissions. Direct transmissions and multi-hop transmissions can be regarded as special types of cooperative transmissions. A direct transmission utilizes no relays while a multi-hop transmission does not combine signals at the destination. In Fig. 1c, the cooperative channel is a virtual multiple-input single-output (MISO) channel, where spatially distributed nodes are coordinated to form a virtual antenna to emulate multiantenna transceivers.

Network Constraints:

Two constraint conditions need to be taken into consideration in the proposed COCO topology control scheme. One is network connectivity, which is the basic requirement in topology control. The end-to-end network connectivity is guaranteed via a hop-by-hop manner in the objective function. Every node is in charge of the connections to all its neighbors. If all the neighbor connections are guaranteed, the end-to-end connectivity in the whole network can be preserved. The other aspect that determines network capacity is the path length. An end-to-end transmission that traverses more hops will import more data packets into the network. Although path length is mainly determined by routing, COCO limits dividing a long link into too many hops locally.