19-03-2012, 11:27 AM
Internet Banking
Chapter–1– Introduction
1.1 Background
1.1.1 Banks have traditionally been in the forefront of harnessing technology to improve their
products, services and efficiency. They have, over a long time, been using electronic
and telecommunication networks for delivering a wide range of value added products
and services. The delivery channels include direct dial – up connections, private
networks, public networks etc and the devices include telephone, Personal Computers
including the Automated Teller Machines, etc. With the popularity of PCs, easy access
to Internet and World Wide Web (WWW), Internet is increasingly used by banks as a
channel for receiving instructions and delivering their products and services to their
customers. This form of banking is generally referred to as Internet Banking, although
the range of products and services offered by different banks vary widely both in their
content and sophistication.
1.1.2 Broadly, the levels of banking services offered through INTERNET can be categorized
in to three types: (i) The Basic Level Service is the banks’ websites which disseminate
1
information on different products and services offered to customers and members of
public in general. It may receive and reply to customers’ queries through e-mail, (ii) In
the next level are Simple Transactional Websites which allow customers to submit their
instructions, applications for different services, queries on their account balances, etc,
but do not permit any fund-based transactions on their accounts, (iii) The third level of
Internet banking services are offered by Fully Transactional Websites which allow the
customers to operate on their accounts for transfer of funds, payment of different bills,
subscribing to other products of the bank and to transact purchase and sale of
securities, etc. The above forms of Internet banking services are offered by traditional
banks, as an additional method of serving the customer or by new banks, who deliver
banking services primarily through Internet or other electronic delivery channels as the
value added services. Some of these banks are known as ‘virtual’ banks or ‘Internetonly’
banks and may not have any physical presence in a country despite offering
different banking services.
1.1.3 From the perspective of banking products and services being offered through Internet,
Internet banking is nothing more than traditional banking services delivered through an
electronic communication backbone, viz, Internet. But, in the process it has thrown
open issues which have ramifications beyond what a new delivery channel would
normally envisage and, hence, has compelled regulators world over to take note of this
emerging channel. Some of the distinctive features of i-banking are:
1. It removes the traditional geographical barriers as it could reach out to customers
of different countries / legal jurisdiction. This has raised the question of jurisdiction
of law / supervisory system to which such transactions should be subjected,
2. It has added a new dimension to different kinds of risks traditionally associated with
banking, heightening some of them and throwing new risk control challenges,
3. Security of banking transactions, validity of electronic contract, customers’ privacy,
etc., which have all along been concerns of both bankers and supervisors have
assumed different dimensions given that Internet is a public domain, not subject to
control by any single authority or group of users,
4. It poses a strategic risk of loss of business to those banks who do not respond in
time, to this new technology, being the efficient and cost effective delivery
2
mechanism of banking services,
5. A new form of competition has emerged both from the existing players and new
players of the market who are not strictly banks.
1.1.4 The Regulatory and Supervisory concerns in i-banking arise mainly out of the
distinctive features outlined above. These concerns can be broadly addressed under
three broad categories, viz, (i) Legal and regulatory issues, (ii) Security and technology
issues and (iii) Supervisory and operational issues. Legal issues cover those relating to
the jurisdiction of law, validity of electronic contract including the question of
repudiation, gaps in the legal / regulatory environment for electronic commerce. On the
question of jurisdiction the issue is whether to apply the law of the area where access to
Internet has been made or where the transaction has finally taken place. Allied to this is
the question where the income has been generated and who should tax such income.
There are still no definite answers to these issues.
1.1.5 Security of i-banking transactions is one of the most important areas of concerns to the
regulators. Security issues include questions of adopting internationally accepted stateof-
the art minimum technology standards for access control, encryption / decryption (
minimum key length etc), firewalls, verification of digital signature, Public Key
Infrastructure (PKI) etc. The regulator is equally concerned about the security policy
for the banking industry, security awareness and education.
1.1.6 The supervisory and operational issues include risk control measures, advance warning
system, Information technology audit and re-engineering of operational procedures.
The regulator would also be concerned with whether the nature of products and
services offered are within the regulatory framework and whether the transactions do
not camouflage money-laundering operations.
1.1.7 The Central Bank may have its concern about the impact of Internet banking on its
monetary and credit policies. As long as Internet is used only as a medium for delivery of
banking services and facilitator of normal payment transactions, perhaps, it may not
impact monetary policy. However, when it assumes a stage where private sector
initiative produces electronic substitution of money like e-cheque, account based cards
and digital coins, its likely impact on monetary system can not be overlooked. Even
countries where i-banking has been quite developed, its impact on monetary policy has
3
not been significant. In India, such concern, for the present is not addressed as the
Internet banking is still in its formative stage.
1.1.8 The world over, central bankers and regulators have been addressing themselves to
meet the new challenges thrown open by this form of banking. Several studies have
pointed to the fact that the cost of delivery of banking service through Internet is
several times less than the traditional delivery methods. This alone is enough reason for
banks to flock to Internet and to deliver more and more of their services through
Internet and as soon as possible. Not adopting this new technology in time has the risk
of banks getting edged out of competition. In such a scenario, the thrust of regulatory
thinking has been to ensure that while the banks remain efficient and cost effective, they
must be aware of the risks involved and have proper built-in safeguards, machinery and
systems to manage the emerging risks. It is not enough for banks to have systems in
place, but the systems must be constantly upgraded to changing and well-tested
technologies, which is a much bigger challenge. The other aspect is to provide
conducive regulatory environment for orderly growth of such form of banking. Central
Banks of many countries have put in place broad regulatory framework for i-banking.
1.1.9 In India, too i-banking has taken roots. A number of banks have set up banking
portals allowing their customers to access facilities like obtaining information, querying
on their accounts, etc. Soon, still higher level of online services will be made available.
Other banks will sooner than later, take to Internet banking. The Indian scenario is
discussed in detail in Chapter-4 of this report.
1.2 Constitution of the Working Group
1.2.1 In the above background Reserve Bank of India constituted a Working Group to
examine different issues relating to i-banking and recommend technology, security,
legal standards and operational standards keeping in view the international best
practices. The Group is headed by the Chief General Manager–in–Charge of the
Department of Information Technology and comprised experts from the fields of
banking regulation and supervision, commercial banking, law and technology. The
Bank also constituted an Operational Group under its Executive Director comprising
officers from different disciplines in the bank, who would guide implementation of the
recommendations. The composition of both the Groups is at Annexure-2 and
4
Annexure-3.
1.2.2 Terms of reference
The Working Group, as its terms of reference, was to examine different aspects of
Internet banking from regulatory and supervisory perspective and recommend
appropriate standards for adoption in India, particularly with reference to the
following:
1. Risks to the organization and banking system, associated with Internet banking and
methods of adopting International best practices for managing such risks.
2. Identifying gaps in supervisory and legal framework with reference to the existing
banking and financial regulations, IT regulations, tax laws, depositor protection,
consumer protection, criminal laws, money laundering and other cross border issues
and suggesting improvements in them.
3. Identifying international best practices on operational and internal control issues, and
suggesting suitable ways for adopting the same in India.
4. Recommending minimum technology and security standards, in conformity with
international standards and addressing issues like system vulnerability, digital
signature ,information system audit etc.
5. Clearing and settlement arrangement for electronic banking and electronic money
transfer; linkages between i-banking and e-commerce
6. Any other matter, which the Working Group may think as of relevance to Internet
banking in India.
1.3. Approach of the Group:
1.3.1 The first meeting of the Working Group was held on July 19, 2000. It was decided
that members of both Working Group and Operational Group would participate in all
meetings and deliberations. The Group, in its first meeting identified the broad
parameters within which it would focus its deliberations.
1.3.2 The Group agreed that Internet banking is a part of the electronic banking (ebanking),
the main difference being that in i-banking the delivery channel was
Internet, a public domain. Although the concerns of e-banking and i-banking have
many things in common, the fact that Internet is a public domain called for additional
security measures. It was agreed that the Group would primarily focus its attention
5
on I - banking and to the extent there were commonality between i-banking and ebanking,
its recommendation would also apply to e-banking.
1.3.3 The Group further held that i-banking did not mean any basic change in the nature of
banking and the associated risks and returns. All the same, being a public domain and
a highly cost effective delivery channel, it does impact both the dimension and
magnitude of traditional banking risks. In fact, it adds new kinds of risk to banking.
Some of the concerns of the Regulatory Authority in i-banking relate to technology
standards including the level of security and uncertainties of legal jurisdiction etc. Its
cost effective character provides opportunities for efficient delivery of banking
services and higher profitability and a threat to those who fail to harness it.
1.3.4 The Group decided to focus on above three major areas, where supervisory attention
was needed. Accordingly, three sub-groups were formed for looking into three
specific areas: (i) technology and security aspects, (ii) legal aspects and (iii)
regulatory and supervisory issues. The sub-groups could seek help of external experts
in the relevant fields, if needed.
1.4 Layout of the Report:
1.4.1. The views of the Group were crystallized after several rounds of deliberations of
members of both the Working Group and the Operational Group. The reports
prepared by the three sub-groups were discussed and assimilated in to this report.
The report is presented in nine chapters. Chapter–1, the introductory chapter, gives
the background leading to the formation of the Group, its composition, terms of
reference and the approach adopted by the Group in finalizing its recommendations.
1.4.2. The basic structure of Internet and its characteristics are described in Chapter–2 in
order to explain the nature of concerns addressed in the chapters to follow. Also
explained in the chapter is the growth of Internet banking and different products and
different e-commerce concepts.
1.4.3. Chapter–3 describes International experience in i-banking, particularly with reference
to USA, United Kingdom and other Scandinavian countries, who are pioneers in this
form of banking. Chapter- 4 looks at the Indian scenario as it prevails now.
1.4.4. Chapter–5 discusses different types of risks associated with banking in general and ibanking
in particular. Emphasis is given on normal risks associated with banking
6
which gets accentuated when the services are delivered through Internet. Risks
relating to money laundering and other cross border transactions are discussed.
1.4.5. Technology and security standards are core concerns for Regulatory Authorities in
relation to Internet banking. A separate sub-group looked in to these issues, which
are discussed in detail in Chapter–6. Emphasis is given on technology and security
standards and policy issues rather than on products and technical tools.
1.4.6 Another important regulatory concern is the legal environment in which i-banking
transactions are carried out. It is of importance to identify gaps in the existing
framework and to suggest changes required. The legal sub-group had made a detailed
analysis of legal questions involved, which are discussed in Chapter – 7.
1.4.7 Chapter–8 deals with various control measures required to be adopted by banks to
manage risks discussed in earlier chapters. Operational aspects like internal control,
early detection system, IT audit, technical manpower, etc are also discussed. The
impact of i-banking on clearing and settlement arrangements has also been addressed.
The sub-group on Regulatory and Supervisory issues had addressed the above
questions.
1.4.8 Chapter–9 contains recommendations of the Working Group. Shri S. H. Bhojani had
disagreement with some of the observations / recommendations by the Group and a
note of dissent is appended as Annexure-1.
1.5. Acknowledgement
1.5.1 The group wishes to acknowledge and put on record its appreciation of support
received from various quarters in completing the Report.
1.5.2 The Central Banks and Regulatory Authorities of different countries and the Bank for
International Settlement were approached for papers compiled by them on the subject
and for details of regulations already in place. All relevant materials were received
from them promptly. The Group gratefully acknowledges their support and
cooperation.
1.5.3 Shri Girish Vaidya of Infosys technologies Ltd. had made an erudite presentation on
Internet Banking to the Group, which was very useful in finalizing this report. The
Group gratefully acknowledges his efforts.
1.5.4 Three sub-groups were formed to focus deliberations on three important aspects of
7
Internet banking. These sub-groups utilized the expertise of professionals / bankers in
finalizing their views. The convenors and members of sub-groups worked most
diligently to produce reports of very high quality. The Group gratefully thanks them
for their efforts. The Group gratefully acknowledges the contributions made by
S/Shri G. Subba Rao, Head, Internal Audit , ABN Amro Bank, Shri P. C Narayan,
Executive Vice President, Global Trust Bank and Shri Sasidharan Menon , Head,
Internal Audit , Deutsche Bank as members of sub-group on Regulatory and
Supervisory Issues.
1.5.5 The Department of Banking Operations and Development provided secretarial service
to the Working Group. The Group wishes to put on record its appreciation of efforts
put in by the secretarial team consisting of DGMs (Shri SR. Das, Shri Arnab Roy),
AGM (Shri Indrajit Roy) and Managers (Shri Chetan N Balwir, Dr. T K
Karthykeyan, Shri JP Bansal) in organizing the meetings, arranging the background
papers and drafting of the Report.
1.5.6 The Group wishes to place on record its appreciation of contributions made by all
members of the Operational Group who participated in the deliberations and offered
their valuable suggestions and guidance.
1.5.7 The Member-secretary of the Working Group, Shri M. P. Kothari, worked with
utmost zeal in ensuring smooth conduct of the entire process right from the inception
of the Working Group till the finalization of the Report. The Group gratefully
acknowledges his efforts, but for which the Report would not have been completed.
8
Chapter–2– Internet Banking - a new medium
2.1 Internet – its basic structure and topology
2.1.1 Internet is a vast network of individual computers and computer networks connected to
and communicate with each other using the same communication protocol – TCP/IP
(Transmission Control Protocol / Internet Protocol). When two or more computers are
connected a network is created; connecting two or more networks create ‘internetwork’
or Internet. The Internet, as commonly understood, is the largest example of
such a system. Internet is often and aptly described as ‘Information Superhighway’, a
means to reach innumerable potential destinations. The destination can be any one of
the connected networks and host computers.
2.1.2 Internet has evolved to its present state out of a US Department of Defence project
ARPANet (Advanced Research Project Administration Network), developed in the late
1960s and early 1970s as an experiment in wide area networking. A major perceived
advantage of ARPANet was that the network would continue to operate even if a
segment of it is lost or destroyed since its operation did not depend on operation of any
single computer. Though originally designed as a defence network, over the years it
was used predominantly in areas of scientific research and communication. By the
1980s, it moved out of Pentagon’s control and more independent networks from US
and outside got connected to it. In 1986, the US National Science Foundation (NSF)
established a national network based on ARPA protocol using commercial telephone
lines for connectivity. The NSFNet was accessible by a much larger scientific
community, commercial networks and general users and the number of host computers
grew rapidly. Eventually, NSFNet became the framework of today’s Internet.
ARPANet was officially decommissioned in 1990.
2.1.3 It has become possible for innumerable computers operating on different platforms to
communicate with each other over Internet because they adopt the same
communication protocol, viz, TCP/IP. The latter, which stands for ‘Transmission
Control Protocol / Internet Protocol’, is a set of rules which define how computers
communicate with each other. In order to access Internet one must have an account in
9
a host computer, set up by any one of the ISPs (Internet Service Providers). The
accounts can be SLIP (Serial Line Internet Protocol) or PPP (Point to Point Protocol)
account. These accounts allow creating temporary TCP/IP sessions with the host,
thereby allowing the computer to join the Internet and directly establish communication
with any other computer in the Internet. Through this type of connection, the client
computer does not merely act as a remote terminal of the host, but can run whatever
programs are available on the web. It can also run several programs simultaneously,
subject to limitations of speed and memory of the client computer and modem. TCP/IP
protocol uses a unique addressing scheme through which each computer on the
network is identified.
2.1.4 TCP / IP protocol is insecure because data packets flowing through TCP / IP networks
are not normally encrypted. Thus, any one who interrupts communication between two
machines will have a clear view of the data, passwords and the like. This has been
addressed through Secured Socket Layer(SSL), a Transport Layer Security (TLS)
system which involves an encrypted session between the client browser and the web
server.
2.1.5 FTP or File Transfer Protocol is a mechanism for transferring files between computers
on the Internet. It is possible to transfer a file to and from a computer (ftp site) without
having an account in that machine. Any organization intending to make available to
public its documents would normally set up a ftp site from which any one can access
the documents for download. Certain ftp sites are available to validated users with an
account ID and password.
2.1.6 e-mail: The most common and basic use of Internet is the exchange of e-mail
(electronic mail). It is an extremely powerful and revolutionary result of Internet, which
has facilitated almost instantaneous communication with people in any part of the
globe. With enhancements like attachment of documents, audio, video and voice mail,
this segment of Internet is fast expanding as the most used communication medium for
the whole world. Many websites offer e-mail as a free facility to individuals. Many
corporates have interfaced their private networks with Internet in order to make their email
accessible from outside their corporate network.
2.1.7 World Wide Web (WWW)
10
2.1.7.1 Internet encompasses any electronic communication between computers using
TCP/IP protocol, such as e-mail, file transfers etc. WWW is a segment of Internet,
which uses Hyper Text Markup Language (HTML) to link together files containing
text, rich text, sound, graphics, video etc. and offers a very convenient means of
navigating through the net. It uses hypertext transfer protocol (HTTP) for
communication between computers. Web documents, which are referred to as pages,
can contain links to other related documents and so on, in a tree like structure. The
person browsing one document can access any other linked page. The web documents
and the web browsers which are the application programs to access them, are designed
to be platform independent. Thus any web document can be accessed irrespective of the
platform of the computer accessing the document and that of the host computer. The
programming capabilities and platform independence of Java and Java applets have
further enriched the web. The ‘point and click’ method of browsing is extremely simple
for any lay user of the net. In fact, the introduction of web since early 1990 has made
Internet an extremely popular medium and its use in business has been enhanced
dramatically.
2.1.7.2 The next in the HTML genre is the Extensible Markup Language (XML), which
allows automated two-way information flow between data stores and browser screens.
XML documents provide both the raw content of data and the data structure and is
projected by its proponents as taking the web technology beyond the limits of HTML.
2.1.8 Wireless Application Protocol (WAP):
WAP is the latest industry standard which provides wireless access to Internet through
handheld devices like a cellular telephone. This is an open standard promoted by WAP
forum and has been adopted by world’s all major handset manufacturers. WAP is
supplemented by Wireless Application Environment (WAE), which provides industry
wise standard for developing applications and services for wireless communication
networks. This is based on WWW technology and provides for application for small
screens, with interactive capabilities and adequate security. Wireless Transaction
Protocol (WTP), which is the equivalent of TCP, sets the communication rules and
Wireless Transport Layer Security (WTLS) provides the required security by
encrypting all the session data. WAP is set to revolutionize the commercial use of net.
11
2.1.9 Security:
One of the biggest attractions of Internet as an electronic medium is its openness and
freedom. It is a public domain and there is no restriction on who can use it as long as
one adheres to its technical parameters. This has also given rise to concerns over the
security of data and information transfer and privacy. These concerns are common to
any network including closed user group networks. But over the Internet, the
dimensions of risk are larger while the control measures are relatively fewer. These
issues are discussed in detail in Chapter–5 and Chapter–6 of the report. It will be
sufficient to say here that the key components of such concern are, (i) authentication,
viz., assurance of identity of the person in a deal, (ii) authorization, viz., a party doing a
transaction is authorized to do so, (iii) the privacy or confidentiality of data,
information relating to any deal, (iv) data integrity, viz., assurance that the data has not
been altered and (v) non repudiation, viz., a party to the deal can not deny that it
originated the communication or data.
2.2 E-Commerce:
2.2.1 Even though started as network primarily for use by researchers in defence and
scientific community, with the introduction of WWW in early 1990s, use of Internet for
commerce has grown tremendously. E-commerce involves individuals and business
organizations exchanging business information and instructions over electronic media
using computers, telephones and other telecommunication equipments. Such form of
doing business has been in existence ever since electronic mode of data / information
exchange was developed, but its scope was limited only as a medium of exchange of
information between entities with a pre-established contractual relationship. However,
Internet has changed the approach to e-commerce; it is no longer the same business
with an additional channel for information exchange, but one with new strategy and
models.
2.2.2 A business model generally focuses on (i) where the business operates, that is, the
market, the competitors and the customers, (ii) what it sells, that is, its products and
services (iii) the channels of distribution, that is, the medium for sale and distribution of
its products and (iv) the sources of revenue and expenditure and how these are
affected. Internet has influenced all the four components of business model and thus has
12
come to influence the business strategy in a profound way. The size of the market has
grown enormously as technically, one can access the products and services from any
part of the world. So does the potential competition. The methods of reaching out to
customers, receiving the response and offering services have a new, simpler and
efficient alternative, now, that is, Internet. The cost of advertisement, offer and delivery
of services through Internet has reduced considerably, forcing most companies to
rework their strategies to remain in competition.
2.2.3 A research note by Paul Timmers of European commission had identified eleven
business models, which have been commercially implemented. These are e-shop, eprocurement,
e-auction, e-mall, Third-party market place, Virtual communities, Value
chain service providers, Value chain integrators, Collaboration platforms and
Information brokers. He classified business models along two dimensions, i.e, degree of
innovation and extent of integration of functions. The innovation ranged from the
electronic version of a traditional way of doing business (e-shop) to more innovative
ways by offering functions that did not exist before. The second dimension, i.e, extent
of integration ranges from a single function business model (like e-shop) to fully
integrated functionality (value chain integrator). In the top end of the graph are models,
which cannot be implemented in a traditional way and are critically dependent upon
information technology and creating value from information flow. Business models, in
between these two limits are a combination of both dimensions in different degrees and
have some degree of analogy in traditional firms.
2.2.4 There are two types of e-commerce ventures in operation: the old brick and mortar
companies, who have adopted electronic medium, particularly Internet, to enhance
their existing products and services, and / or to offer new products and services and
the pure e-ventures who have no visible physical presence. This difference has wider
ramifications than mere visibility when it comes to issues like customer’s trust, brand
equity, ability to service the customers, adopting new business culture and cost.
These aspects of e-commerce will be touched upon in the following discussions.
2.2.5 Another way of classifying the e-commerce is by the targeted counterpart of a business,
viz, whether the counterpart is a final consumer or another business in the distribution
chain. Accordingly, the two broad categories are: Business-to-Consumer (B2C) and
13
Business-to-Business (B2B).
2.2.6 Business-to-Consumers (B2C):
2.2.6.1 In the B2C category are included single e-shops, shopping malls, e-broking, eauction,
e-banking, service providers like travel related services, financial services etc.,
education, entertainment and any other form of business targeted at the final consumer.
Some of the features, opportunities and concerns common to this category of business
irrespective of the business segment, are the following.
2.2.6.2 Opportunities:
2.2.6.2.1 Internet provides an ever-growing market both in terms of number of potential
customers and geographical reach. Technological development has made access to
Internet both cheaper and faster. More and more people across the globe are accessing
the net either through PCs or other devices. The purchasing power and need for quality
service of this segment of consumers are considerable. Anybody accessing Internet is a
potential customer irrespective of his or her location. Thus, any business targeting final
consumers cannot ignore the business potential of Internet.
2.2.6.2.2 Internet offers a unique opportunity to register business presence in a global market.
Its effectiveness in disseminating information about one’s business at a relatively cost
effective manner is tremendous. Time sensitive information can be updated faster than
any other media. A properly designed website can convey a more accurate and focussed
image of a product or service than any other media. Use of multimedia capabilities, i.e.,
sound, picture, movies etc., has made Internet as an ideal medium for information
dissemination. However, help of other media is necessary to draw the potential
customers to the web site.
2.2.6.2.3 The quality of service is a key feature of any e-commerce venture. The ability to sell
one’s product at anytime and anywhere to the satisfaction of customers is essential for
e-business to succeed. Internet offers such opportunity, since the business presence is
not restricted by time zone and geographical limitations. Replying to customers’
queries through e-mail, setting up (Frequently Asked Questions) FAQ pages for
anticipated queries, offering interactive help line, accepting customers’ complaints
online 24 hours a day and attending to the same, etc. are some of the features of ebusiness
which enhance the quality of service to the customers. It is of crucial
14
importance for an e-venture to realize that just as it is easier to approach a customer
through Internet, it is equally easy to lose him. The customer has the same facility to
move over to another site.
2.2.6.2.4 Cost is an important issue in an e-venture. It is generally accepted that the cost of
overhead, servicing and distribution, etc. through Internet is less compared to the
traditional way of doing business. Although the magnitude of difference varies
depending on the type of business and the estimates made, but there is unanimity that
Internet provides a substantial cost advantage and this, in fact, is one of the major
driving forces for more number of traditional business adopting to e-commerce and
pure e-commerce firms to sprout.
2.2.6.2.5 Cost of communication through WWW is the least compared to any other medium.
Many a time one’s presence in the web may bring in international enquiries, which the
business might not have targeted. The business should have proper plans to address
such opportunities.
2.2.6.3 Concerns:
2.2.6.3.1 There are a number of obstacles, which an e-commerce venture needs to overcome.
Trust of customers in a web venture is an important concern. Many customers hesitate
to deal with a web venture as they are not sure of the type of products and services
they will receive. This is particularly true in a B2C venture like e-shop, e-mall or eauction
site. Traditional business with well established brands and goodwill and having
a physical presence face less resistance from customers in this regard than a pure eventure.
2.2.6.3.2 Many B2C ventures have ultimately to deliver a product or service in physical form
to the customer for a deal contracted through Internet. This needs proper logistics, an
efficient distribution network, and control over quality of product or service delivered.
These issues are not technology related and any let off in this area can drive the
customer away to the competitor or from e-commerce.
2.2.6.3.3 The privacy of information on the customer’s preferences, credit card and bank
account details etc. and customers’ faith in a system where such privacy is stated to be
ensured are important issues to be addressed. These are mainly technological issues, but
human factor is important both at the business and at the customers’ end and also in
15
building the trust in the system.
2.2.6.3.4 Security of a transaction, authenticity of a deal, identification of a customer etc. are
important technological and systems issues, which are major sources of concern to ecommerce.
Equally important are questions of repudiation of a deal, applicability of
law, jurisdiction of tax laws etc. These are important to all forms of e-commerce,
whether B2C or B2B and all segments of business, i.e, manufacturing, services and
finance and are addressed in different chapters of this report.
2.2.6.3.5 Accessibility to Internet by the consumers is an important issue in B2C domain.
This is particularly so in countries like India where penetration of PCs and other
devices to households for access to Internet is minimal. Also important are availability
of bandwidth and other infrastructure for faster and easier access. Considering that ecommerce
aims at global market, deficiencies of these kinds in the developing world are
no longer concerns confined to these areas, but are global e-commerce concerns.
2.2.7 Business to Business (B2B)
2.2.7.1 As opposed to B2C e-commerce, in B2B domain, the parties to a deal are at different
points of the product supply chain. Typically, in a B2B type domain, a company, its
suppliers, dealers and bankers to all the parties are networked to finalize and settle all
aspects of a deal, online. Perhaps, only the goods in different stages of processing
physically move from the supplier to the dealer. This scenario can be extended to
include the shipper, providers of different ancillary services, IT service provider and the
payment system gateway, etc., depending on the degree of sophistication of the
available systems.
2.2.7.2 Another important feature of a B2B domain, as distinct from B2C, is that business
information / data is integrated to the back office systems of parties to a deal and the
state of straight through processing (STP) or near STP is achieved. This is a very
significant aspect of B2B model of e-commerce, which results in improved profits
through lowering cost and reducing inventories.
2.2.7.3 For example, in a B2B environment, typically, the back office system of a company
controls inventory requirement with reference to the order book position updated
regularly on the basis of orders received from dealers through Internet. At the optimum
level of inventory it raises a purchase order with the supplier, whose system in turn,
16
processes the order and confirms supply. Buyer company’s system issues debit
instructions on its bank account for payment to the supplier. The buyer’s bank credits
seller’s bank with the cost of sale though a payment gateway or through RTGS system.
Similar series of transaction processes are also initiated between the company and its
dealers and their respective banks. Once e-commerce relationship is established
between the firms, the transactions of the type shown above can be processed with
minimal human intervention and on 24 hours a day and 7 day a week basis.
2.2.7.4 New business models are emerging in B2B domain. There are portals which offer a
meeting ground to buyers and sellers of different products in supply chain, more like a
buyer-seller meet in international business. This has enabled relatively smaller
companies to enter the global market. Banks in the portal offer financial services for
deals settled through the portal.
2.2.7.5 Technology and networking are important constituents of a B2B type of business
domain. Earlier, only large firms could have access to such technology and they used
private networks with interface to each other for information flow and transaction
processing. A major concern used to be compatibility of EDI platforms across different
B2B partners. Internet with WWW and other standard technology have offered
opportunity to relatively smaller and medium sized firms to integrate their operations in
B2B model and take advantage of the benefits it offers. It has also led to
standardization of software platforms.
2.2.7.6 Other new forms of business models in B2B domain are Application Service
Providers (ASP) and Service Integrators. ASPs offer application software online to ecommerce
companies who pay for the same according to the use without owning it.
Often entire back office processing is taken care of by ASPs and other service
integrators. However, the utility of such service providers will to a large extent depend
on the business strategy of the e-venture.
2.2.7.7 The concerns of B2B e-commerce are similar to those of B2C, discussed earlier. The
security issues are more pronounced because of high value transfers taking place
through the net. So also are the issues relating to privacy of information, law, tax
repudiation etc. The other issues of importance to a B2B firm are the choice of
appropriate technology, the issue of build or outsource, maintenance and training of
17
personnel, etc., since they involve large investments and are critical to success.
2.2.7.8 Several studies have attempted to assess the relative importance of B2B and B2C
business domains. There is wide difference in estimates of volume of business
transacted over Internet and its components under B2C and B2B. However, most
studies agree that volume of transactions in B2B domain far exceeds that in B2C. This
is expected result. There is also a growing opinion that the future of e-business lies in
B2B domain, as compared to B2C. This has several reasons some of which are
already discussed earlier, like low penetration of PCs to households, low bandwidth
availability etc., in a large part of the world. The success of B2C ventures depends to
a large extent on the shopping habits of people in different parts of the world. A
survey sponsored jointly by Confederation of Indian Industries and Infrastructure
Leasing and Financial Services on e-commerce in India in 1999 made the following
observations. 62% of PC owners and 75% of PC non-owners but who have access to
Internet would not buy through the net, as they were not sure of the product offered.
The same study estimated the size of B2B business in India by the year 2001 to be
varying between Rs. 250 billion to Rs. 500 billion. In a recent study done by Arthur
Anderson, it has been estimated that 84% of total e-business revenue is generated
from B2B segment and the growth prospects in this segment are substantial. It has
estimated the revenues to be anywhere between US $ 2.7 trillion to over US $ 7
trillion within the next three years (2003).
2.3 The Growth of Internet Banking and common products:
2.3.1 Internet Banking (Fig. 1) is a product of e-commerce in the field of banking and
financial services. In what can be described as B2C domain for banking industry,
Internet Banking offers different online services like balance enquiry, requests for
cheque books, recording stop-payment instructions, balance transfer instructions,
account opening and other forms of traditional banking services. Mostly, these are
traditional services offered through Internet as a new delivery channel. Banks are also
offering payment services on behalf of their customers who shop in different e-shops, emalls
etc. Further, different banks have different levels of such services offered, starting
from level-1 where only information is disseminated through Internet to level-3 where
18
online transactions are put through. These aspects have been dealt with in brief in the
introductory chapter and again detailed products and services are discussed in chapters
3 and 4. Hence, in the following paragraphs I-banking concerns in B2B domain are
discussed.
2.3.2 Considering the volume of business e-commerce, particularly in B2B domain, has been
generating, it is natural that banking would position itself in an intermediary role in
settling the transactions and offering other trade related services. This is true both in
respect of B2C and B2B domains. Besides, the traditional role of financial intermediary
and settlement agents, banks have also exploited new opportunities offered by Internet
in the fields of integrated service providers, payment gateway services, etc. However,
the process is still evolving and banks are repositioning themselves based on new
emerging e-commerce business models.
2.3.3 In B2B scenario, a new form of e-commerce market place is emerging where various
players in the production and distribution chain are positioning themselves and are
achieving a kind of integration in business information flow and processing (STP or
near STP) leading to efficiencies in the entire supply chain and across industries. Banks
are positioning themselves in such a market in order to be a part of the financial
settlements arising out of transactions of this market and providing wholesale financial
services. This needs integration of business information flow not only across the players
in the supply chain, but with the banks as well.
2.3.4 With the integration of business information flow and higher degree of transparency, the
banks and other financial services institutions have lost some of the information
advantage they used to enjoy and factor in to pricing of their products. However, such
institutions have the advantage of long standing relationships, goodwill and brand,
which are important sources of assurance in a virtual market. Banks are in fact,
converting this goodwill into a business component in e-commerce scenario in
providing settlement and other financial services. Some banks have also moved to
providing digital certificates for transactions through e-markets.
2.3.5 Banks’ strategies in B2B market are responses to different business models emerging in
e-commerce. A recent study by Arthur Andersen shows that banks and financial service
institutions generally adopt one of three business models to respond to e-business
19
challenges. In the first place, they treat it as an extension of existing business without
any significant changes other than procedural and what technology demands. The
second strategy takes the same approach as the first but introduces structural changes
to the underlying business. In the third approach banks launch e-business platform as a
different business from the existing core business and as a different brand of product.
There is no definite answer as to which approach is appropriate. Perhaps it depends on
the type of market the bank is operating, its existing competencies and the legal and
regulatory environment. It is, however, sure that e-banking is evolving beyond the
traditional limits of banking and many new products / services are likely to emerge as ecommerce
matures.
20
Chapter-3 - International experience
3.1 Internet banking has presented regulators and supervisors worldwide with new
challenges. The Internet, by its very nature, reaches across borders and is, for this
reason, engaging the attention of regulatory and supervisory authorities all over the
world. The experience of various countries, as far as Internet banking is concerned, is
outlined in this chapter.
3.2 U.S.A.
3.2.1 In the USA, the number of thrift institutions and commercial banks with transactional
web-sites is 1275 or 12% of all banks and thrifts. Approximately 78% of all
commercial banks with more than $5 billion in assets, 43% of banks with $500 million
to $5 billion in assets, and 10% of banks under $ 500 million in assets have
transactional web-sites. Of the 1275-thrifts/commercial banks offering transactional
Internet banking, 7 could be considered ‘virtual banks’. 10 traditional banks have
established Internet branches or divisions that operate under a unique brand name.
Several new business process and technological advances such as Electronic Bill
Presentment and Payment (EBPP), handheld access devices such as Personal Digital
Assistants (PDAs), Internet Telephone and Wireless Communication channels and
phones are emerging in the US market. A few banks have become Internet Service
Providers (ISPs), and banks may become Internet portal sites and online service
providers in the near future. Reliance on third party vendors is a common feature of
electronic banking ventures of all sizes and degrees of sophistication in the US.
Currently, payments made over the Internet are almost exclusively conducted through
existing payment instruments and networks. For retail e-commerce in the US, most
payments made over the Internet are currently completed with credit cards and are
cleared and settled through existing credit card clearing and settlement systems.
Efforts are under way to make it easier to use debit cards, cheques and the Automated
Clearing House (ACH) to make payments over the Internet. Versions of e-money,
smart cards, e-cheques and other innovations are being experimented with to support
retail payments over the Internet.
21
3.2.2 There is a matrix of legislation and regulations within the US that specifically codifies
the use of and rights associated with the Internet and e-commerce in general, and
electronic banking and Internet banking activities in particular. Federal and state laws,
regulations, and court decisions, and self-regulation among industries groups provide
the legal and operational framework for Internet commerce and banking in the USA.
The international model laws promulgated by the United Nations Commission on
International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) provide the guidance to the member nations on
the necessity for revising existing legal structures to accommodate electronic
transactions. Some important laws of general application to commercial activity over
the Internet within the US are the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), the Uniform
Electronic Transaction Act (UETA) (which provides that electronic documents and
contracts should not be disqualified as legal documents particularly because of their
electronic form), various state laws and regulations on digital signatures and national
encryption standards and export regulations. Many states already have digital signature
and other legislation to enable e-commerce. State laws in this area differ but the trend
is towards creating legislation, which is technology neutral. The E-sign Act, a new US
law that took effect on October 1, 2000, validates contracts concluded by electronic
signatures and equates them to those signed with ink on paper. Under the Act,
electronic signatures using touch-tones (on a telephone), retinal scans and voice
recognition are also acceptable ways of entering into agreements. The E-sign Act takes
a technological neutral approach and does not favor the use of any particular
technology to validate an electronic document. The Act however does not address
issues relating to which US state’s laws would govern an online transaction and which
state’s code would have jurisdiction over a dispute.
3.2.3 The Gramm - Leach – Bliley (GLB) Act has substantially eased restrictions on the
ability of banks to provide other financial services. It has established new rules for the
protection of consumer financial information. The Inter-agency Statement on
Electronic Financial Services and Consumer Compliance (July 1998) addresses
consumer protection laws and describe how they can be met in the context of electronic
delivery. In addition, the Federal Reserve Board has issued a request for comment on
revised proposals that would permit electronic delivery of federally mandated
22
disclosures under the five consumer protection regulations of the FRB (Regulations B,
DD, E, M & Z).
3.2.4 The Interpretive Ruling of the Office of the Comptroller of Currency (OCC) authorizes
a national bank to ‘perform, provide or deliver through electronic means and facilities
any activity, functions, product or service that it is otherwise authorized to perform,
provide or deliver’. The concerns of the Federal Reserve are limited to ensuring that
Internet banking and other electronic banking services are implemented with proper
attention to security, the safety and soundness of the bank, and the protection of the
banks’ customers. Currently, all banks, whether they are ‘Internet only’ or traditional
banks must apply for a charter according to existing guidelines. The five federal
agencies - Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), Federal Reserve System
(FRS), Office of the Comptroller of Currency (OCC), Office of Thrift Supervision
(OTS) and the National Credit Union Association (NCUA) supervise more than 20,000
institutions. In addition, each state has a supervisory agency for the banks that it
charters. Most financial institutions in the US face no prerequisite conditions or
notification requirements for an existing banking institution to begin electronic banking
activities. For these banks, supervisors gather information on electronic banking during
routine annual examination. Newly chartered Internet banks are subject to the standard
chartering procedures. For thrift institutions, however, OTS has instituted a 30-day
advance notification requirement for thrift institutions that plan to establish a
transactional web site. A few State banking departments have instituted a similar
notification requirement for transactional Internet banking web sites.
3.2.5 Supervisory policy, licensing, legal requirements and consumer protection are generally
similar for electronic banking and traditional banking activities. Internet banks are also
subject to the same rules, regulations and policy statement as traditional banks.
However, in response to the risks posed by electronic banking, federal banking agencies
have begun to issue supervisory guidelines and examination procedures for examiners
who review and inspect electronic banking applications. Although specialized banking
procedures are used in some areas of Internet banking activities, the existing
information technology examination framework that addresses access controls,
information security, business recovery and other risk areas generally continues to be
23
applicable. To assist supervisors in monitoring the expansion of Internet banking, state
chartered and national banks have been required since June 1999 to report their
websites’ ‘Uniform Resource Locators’ (URL) in the Quarterly Reports of Financial
Condition that are submitted to supervisors. In addition, examiners review the potential
for reputational risk associated with web-site information or activities, the potential
impact of various Internet strategies on an institution’s financial condition, and the need
to monitor and manage outsourcing relationships. To address these risks, the OCC is
developing specific guidance for establishing ‘Internet only’ banks within the US. The
Banking Industry Technology Secretariat recently announced the formation of a
security lab to test and validate the security of software and hardware used by banking
organizations. If a bank is relying on a third party provider, it is accepted that it should
be able to understand the provided information security programme to effectively
evaluate the security system’s ability to protect bank and customer data. Examination
of service providers’ operations, where necessary, is conducted by one or more Federal
banking agencies pursuant to the Bank Services Company Act, solely to support
supervision of banking organizations.
3.2.6 The Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) introduced the
Information Systems (IS) rating system to be used by federal and state regulators to
assess uniformly financial and service provider risks introduced by information
technology and to identify those institutions and service providers requiring special
supervisor attention. The FFIEC has recently renamed the system as Uniform Rating
System for IT (URSIT), which has enhanced the audit function. The importance of
risk management procedure has been reinforced under the revised system.
3.2.7 Some characteristics of e-money products such as their relative lack of physical bulk,
their potential anonymity and the possibility of effecting fast and remote transfers make
them more susceptible than traditional systems to money laundering activities. The
OCC guidelines lay down an effective ‘know your customer’ policy. Federal financial
institutions, regulators, Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications
(SWIFT) and Clearing House Interbank Payment System (CHIPS) have issued
statements encouraging participants to include information on originators and
beneficiaries.
24
3.3 U.K.
3.3.1 Most banks in U.K. are offering transactional services through a wider range of
channels including Wireless Application Protocol (WAP), mobile phone and T.V. A
number of non-banks have approached the Financial Services Authority (FSA) about
charters for virtual banks or ‘clicks and mortar’ operations. There is a move towards
banks establishing portals.
3.3.2 The Financial Services Authority (FSA) is neutral on regulations of electronic banks.
The current legislation, viz. the Banking Act 1987 and the Building Societies Act,
provides it with the necessary powers and the current range of supervisory tools. A
new legislation, the Financial Services and Market Bill, offers a significant addition in
the form of an objective requiring the FSA to promote public understanding of the
financial system. There is, therefore, no special regime for electronic banks. A draft
Electronic Banking Guidance for supervisors has, however, been developed. A guide
to Bank Policy has also been published by the FSA which is technology neutral, but
specifically covers outsourcing and fraud. The FSA also maintains bilateral discussions
with other national supervisors and monitors developments in the European Union
(EU) including discussions by the Banking Advisory Committee and Group de
Contract. New legislation on money laundering has been proposed and both the British
Bankers Association and the FSA have issued guidance papers in this regard.
3.3.3 The FSA is actively involved in the Basle Committee e-banking group which has
identified authorization, prudential standards, transparency, privacy, money laundering
and cross border provision as issues where there is need for further work. The FSA has
also been supporting the efforts of the G7 Financial Stability Forum, which is exploring
common standards for financial market, which is particularly relevant to the Internet,
which reaches across all borders.
3.3.4 The Financial Services and Markets Bill will replace current powers under the 1987
Banking Act giving the FSA statutory authority for consumer protection and promotion
of consumer awareness. Consumer compliance is required to be ensured via desk based
and on site supervision. The FSA has an Authorization and Enforcement Division,
which sees if web sites referred to them are in violation of U.K. laws.
3.3.5 The FSA has issued guidelines on advertising in U.K. by banks for deposits,
25
investments and other securities, which apply to Internet banking also. The guidelines
include an Appendix on Internet banking. The FSA’s supervisory policy and powers in
relation to breaches in the advertising code (viz. invitation by any authorized person to
take a deposit within U.K., fraudulent inducements to make a deposit, illegal use of
banking names and descriptions, etc.) are the same for Internet banking as they are for
conventional banking. The FSA does not regard a bank authorized overseas, which is
targeting potential depositors in its home market or in third countries as falling within
U.K. regulatory requirements solely by reason of its web site being accessible to
Internet users within the U.K., as the advertisements are not aimed at potential U.K.
depositors.
3.4 Scandinavia
3.4.1 Swedish and Finnish markets lead the world in terms of Internet penetration and the
range and quality of their online services. Merita Nordbanken (MRB) (now Nordic
Bank Holding, a merger between Finland’s Merita and Nordbanker of Sweden) leads in
“log-ins per month” with 1.2 million Internet customers, and its penetration rate in
Finland (around 45%) is among the highest in the world for a bank of ‘brick and
mortar’ origin. Standinaviska Easkilda Banken (SEB) was Sweden’s first Internet
bank, having gone on-line in December 1996. It has 1,000 corporate clients for its
Trading Station – an Internet based trading mechanism for forex dealing, stock-index
futures and Swedish treasury bills and government bonds. Swedbank, is another largesized
Internet bank. Almost all of the approximately 150 banks operating in Norway
had established “net banks”. In Denmark, the Internet banking service of Den Danske
offers funds transfers, bill payments, etc.
3.4.2 The basic on-line activity is paying bills. Swedbank was the first bank in the world to
introduce Electronic Bill Presentment and Payment (EBPP) and now handles 2 million
bill payment a month. E-shopping is another major Internet banking service. MNB has
an on-line “mall” of, more than 900 shops, which accepts its “Solo” payment system.
Swedbank has a similar system called “Direct”. Besides using advanced encryption
technology, the Scandenavian banks have adopted a basic but effective system known
as “challenge response logic”, which involves a list of code numbers sent to every
online client and used in sequence, in combination with their password or PIN. This
26
gives each transaction a unique code, and has so far proved safe. Some banks use even
more sophisticated versions of the same technique. It is not a common practice to use
third party vendors for services.
3.4.3 In Sweden, no formal guidance has been given to examiners by the Sverigesbank on ebanking.
General guidelines apply equally to Internet banking activities. Contractual
regularization between customers and the bank is a concern for regulators and is being
looked into by the authorities.
3.4.4 The role of the Bank of Finland (Suomen Parkki) has been, as part of general oversight
of financial markets in Finland, mainly to monitor the ongoing development of Internet
banking without active participation. Numerous issues concerning Internet banking
have, however, been examined by the Bank of Finland.
3.4.5 All Internet banking operating from a Norwegian platform are subject to all regular
banking regulations, just as any other bank. As part of the standard regulation, there is
also a specific regulation on the banks’ use of IT. This regulation dates from 1992
when Internet banking was not the main issue, but it covers all IT systems, including
Internet banking. The regulation secures that banks’ purchase, development, use and
phase out of IT systems is conducted in a safe and controlled manner. An Act relating
to Payment systems defines payment systems as those which are based on standardized
terms for transfer of funds from or between customer accounts in banks/financial
undertakings when the transfer is based on use of payment cards, numeric codes or any
other form of independent user identification. Internet banking is covered by this
regulation. The Banking, Insurance and Securities Commission may order for
implementation of measures to remedy the situation if there is a violation of provisions.
3.4.6 In addition to their national laws, countries in Europe are also expected to implement
European Union (EU) directives. In 1995, the EU passed a Europe-wide Data
Protection Directive aimed at granting individuals greater protection from abuses of
their personal information. It also passed the Telecommunications Directive that
prescribes special protection in relation to telephones, digital TVs, mobile
communications, etc. Every EU country is to have a privacy commissioner to enforce
the regulations as they apply within the EU. The EU directive on electronic signature is
also required to be implemented in national laws.
27
3.5 Other Countries
3.5.1 Australia:
3.5.1.1 Internet Banking in Australia is offered in two forms: web-based and through the
provision of proprietary software. Initial web-based products have focused on personal
banking whereas the provision of proprietary software has been targeted at the
business/corporate sector. Most Australian-owned banks and some foreign subsidiaries
of banks have transactional or interactive web-sites. Online banking services range
from FIs’ websites providing information on financial products to enabling account
management and financial transactions. Customer services offered online include
account monitoring (electronic statements, real-time account balances), account
management (bill payments, funds transfers, applying for products on-line) and financial
transactions (securities trading, foreign currency transactions). Electronic Bill
Presentment and Payment (EBPP) is at an early stage. Features offered in proprietary
software products (enabling business and corporation customers to connect to the
financial institutions (via dial-up/leased line/extranet) include account reporting,
improved reconciliation, direct payments, payroll functionality and funds transfer
between accounts held at their own or other banks. Apart from closed payment
systems (involving a single payment-provider), Internet banking and e-commerce
transactions in Australia are conducted using long-standing payment instruments and
are cleared and settled through existing clearing and settlement system. Banks rely on
third party vendors or are involved with outside providers for a range of products and
services including e-banking. Generally, there are no ‘virtual’ banks licensed to operate
in Australia.
3.5.1.2 The Electronic Transactions Act, 1999 provides certainty about the legal status of
electronic transactions and allows for Australians to use the Internet to provide
Commonwealth Departments and agencies with documents which have the same legal
status as traditional paperwork. The Australian Securities and Investments
Commission (ASIC) is the Australian regulator with responsibility for consumer aspects
of banking, insurance and superannuation and as such, it is responsible for developing
policy on consumer protection issues relating to the Internet and e-commerce. ASIC
currently has a draft proposal to expand the existing Electronic Funds Transfer Code of
28
Conduct (a voluntary code that deals with transactions initiated using a card and a PIN)
to cover all forms of consumer technologies, including stored value cards and other
new electronic payment products. Australia’s anti-money laundering regulator is the
Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre (AUSTRAC).
3.5.1.3 Responsibility for prudential supervisory matters lies with the Australian Prudential
Regulation Authority (APRA). APRA does not have any Internet specific legislation,
regulations or policy, and banks are expected to