19-09-2017, 10:21 AM
The brain's fingerprint is a controversial, untested and questionable technique invented by Lawrence Farwell that he says uses EEG to determine if specific information is stored in a subject's brain. The technique consists of measuring and recording a person's electric brain waves and their brain response. Comparison of brain fingerprints with polygraphy showed mixed results consistent with "a combination of proven techniques and dangerously exaggerated benefits."
In 2001, brain fingerprints were ruled admissible for use of the Iowa court by the Harrington decision against the state of Iowa. It was also used in India until a 2010 Supreme Court of India. R. R. Lakshmanan, a judge and former chairman of the Indian Law Commission, welcomed this decision, describing the fingerprints of the brain as "so scientific that there were no buyers anywhere else in the world."
In 2001, brain fingerprints were ruled admissible for use of the Iowa court by the Harrington decision against the state of Iowa. It was also used in India until a 2010 Supreme Court of India. R. R. Lakshmanan, a judge and former chairman of the Indian Law Commission, welcomed this decision, describing the fingerprints of the brain as "so scientific that there were no buyers anywhere else in the world."