31-10-2016, 10:21 AM
1462259125-NuclearPowersem.pptx (Size: 926.4 KB / Downloads: 5)
California Nuclear energy
Each of the five reactors produces about 1,100 million watts (megawatts) of electricity
This is enough to power one million homes per reactor
Each reactor’s production is equivalent to 15 million barrels of oil or 3.5 million tons of coal a year.
The total 5,500 reactor produced megawatts is out of a peak state electrical power of 30,000 – 40,000 megawatts.
Worldwide Nuclear Power Reactors
There are 440 nuclear power reactors in 31 countries.
30 more are under construction.
They account for 16% of the world’s electricity.
They produce a total of 351 gigawatts (billion watts) of electricity.
World Nuclear Power Plants
Nuclear Electricity Production by Countries and Regions in Gigawatts (World Total 350 Gigawatts) and percent of electricity
How a Nuclear Reactor works
235U fissions by absorbing a neutron and producing 2 to 3 neutrons, which initiate on average one more fission to make a controlled chain reaction
Normal water is used as a moderator to slow the neutrons since slow neutrons take longer to pass by a U nucleus and have more time to be absorbed
The protons in the hydrogen in the water have the same mass as the neutron and stop them by a billiard ball effect
The extra neutrons are taken up by protons to form deuterons
235U is enriched from its 0.7% in nature to about 3% to produce the reaction, and is contained in rods in the water
Boron control rods are inserted to absorb neutrons when it is time to shut down the reactor
The hot water is boiled or sent through a heat exchanger to produce steam. The steam then powers turbines.
Production of Plutonium (Pu) in Nuclear Reactors
239Pu is produced in nuclear reactors by the absorption of a neutron on 238U, followed by two beta decays
239Pu also fissions by absorbing a thermal neutron, and on average produces 1/3 of the energy in a fuel cycle.
239Pu is relatively stable, with a half life of 24 thousand years.
It is used in nuclear weapons
It can be bred for nuclear reactors
Nuclear Weapons to Reactor Fuel
We are buying highly enriched uranium (20% 235U) from the former Soviet Union’s nuclear weapons for 20 years from 1993--2013
Converting it to low enriched uranium (3% 235U) for reactor fuel
It will satisfy 9 years of US reactor fuel demand
It comes from 6,855 Soviet nuclear warheads so far
Nuclear Plant Future
The countries of the world are each planning their own course of nuclear plant development or decline
Nuclear power is competitive with natural gas
It is non-polluting
It does not contribute to global warming
Obtaining the fuel only takes 5% of the energy output
Plant licenses have been extended from 20 years to an additional 20 years
Nuclear Plant Future
Newer designs are being sought to make them more economical and safer
Preapproval of a few designs will hasten development
Disposal of high level radioactive waste still being studied, but scientists believe deep burial would work
Because they are have large electrical output, their cost at $2 billion is hard to obtain and guarantee with banks
Replacing plants may be cheaper using the same sites and containment vessels
Nuclear Problems and Solutions
Three Mile Island 1979
50% core meltdown, stuck valve with no indicator released water, but containment vessel held
More sensors added, better communication to experts in Washington, don’t turn off emergency cooling
28 year US safety record since accident
Chernobyl 1986
Human stupidity turned off cooling system
Poor steam cooling reactor design allowed unstable steam pocket to explode
Graphite caught fire
Design not used in other countries
Yucca Mountain Project: Nuclear Fuel and High Level Waste Repository
Much more secure repository than leaving high level waste at 60 reactor sites around the country.
On old atomic bomb testing base, inside a mountain.
The storage is above the water table.
The Yucca Mountain site would be 60% filled by present waste.
US has legal commitment to the reactor industry.
Site has been studied extensively by scientists for over 20 years.
Will store waste during its 10,000 year decay time.
Questions of how to deflect dripping water around and under the storage vessels.
Questions of radioactive decay weakening storage containers.
A solution would be to build containers that can be opened and reincased, or to which surrounded casings could be added.
Liquid Metal Fast Breeder Reactor
Uses the fast neutrons from 235U fission on surrounding 238U to produce 239Pu
In 10-20 years, enough Pu is produced to power another reactor
No moderators are allowed
No water, must use liquid sodium coolant
U must be at 15%-30% enrichment to generate power with fast neutrons while breeding Pu
This is at weapons grade enrichment, however
Super-Phenix in France has operated for 20 years
Nuclear Power Proposed Solution?
Richard Garwin , MIT and industry propose:
If 50 years from now the world uses twice as much energy, and half comes from nuclear power
Need 4,000 nuclear reactors, using about a million tons of Uranium a year
With higher cost terrestrial ore, would last for 300 years
Breeder reactors creating Plutonium could extend the supply to 200,000 years
Nonpolluting, non-CO2 producing source
Need more trained nuclear engineers and sites
Study fuel reprocessing, waste disposal, and safer designs.
While nuclear reactors have to be on all day and night, and power use is less at night, they could be used to charge up electric cars.
Until electric cars or a hydrogen generation economy, they might only be used for the 40% of generation used at night, up from the present 20% that they generate.
Fusion Reactors
Fusion easiest for Deuteron (D) + Tritium(T):
D(p,n) + T(p,nn) → 4He(pp,nn) + n
in a high temperature plasma.
Replacement T created from Li blanket around reactor
n + 6Li → 4He + T
Fusion reactors
International ITER in 2012 for research for a decade, costing $5 billion
Current stalemate over siting in France or Japan
Followed by DEMO for a functioning plant, taking another 10 years.
Design and completion of a commercial plant not until 2050.
US Lithium supply would last a few hundred years.
Still would be a radioactive waste disposal problem.