16-10-2012, 10:34 AM
Assessment centre
Assessment centre.docx (Size: 16 KB / Downloads: 24)
An assessment centre is a central location where managers may come together to have their participation in job related exercises evaluated by trained observers. Mostly used for executive hiring, assessment centres are now being used for evaluating executive or supervisory potential.
The assessment center method involves multiple evaluation techniques, including various types of job-related simulations, and sometimes interviews and psychological tests. Common job simulations used in assessment centers are:
• in-basket exercises
• group discussions
• simulations of interviews with "subordinates" or "clients"
• fact-finding exercises
• analysis/decision-making problems
• oral presentation exercises
• written communication exercises
Simulations are designed to bring out behavior relevant to the most important aspects of the position or level for which the assessees are being considered. Known as "dimensions" (or competencies), these aspects of the job are identified prior to the assessment center by analyzing the target position. A job analysis procedure identifies the behaviors, motivations, and types of knowledge that are critical for success in the target position. During assessment, the job simulations bring out assessees’ behavior or knowledge in the target dimensions.
A traditional assessment center involves six participants and lasts from one to three days. As participants work through the simulations, they are observed by assessors (usually three line managers) who are trained to observe and evaluate behavior and knowledge level. Assessors observe different participants in each simulation and take notes on special observation forms. After participants have completed their simulations, assessors spend one or more days sharing their observations and agreeing on evaluations. If used, test and interview data are integrated into the decision-making process. The assessors’ final assessment contained in a written report, details participants’ strengths and development needs, and may evaluate their overall potential for success in the target position if that is the purpose of the center.
Perhaps the most important feature of the assessment center method is that it relates not to current job performance, but to future performance. By observing how a participant handles the problems and challenges of the target job or job level (as simulated in the exercises), assessors get a valid picture of how that person would perform in the target position. This is especially useful when assessing individuals who hold jobs that don’t offer them an opportunity to exhibit behavior related to the target position or level. This is often the case with individuals who aspire to management positions but presently hold positions that don’t give them an opportunity to exhibit management-related behavior on the job.
Checklists:-
Performance appraisal checklists provide the evaluator with a series of statements, phrases, or adjectives that describe employee performance. These statements may be subdivided into specific factors, such as quantity of work or quality of work, with the descriptors listed under each category. Occasionally, the phrases or adjectives are simply listed without categorization. The appraiser marks the statement or adjective considered to be most descriptive of the employee’s performance during the period covered by the appraisal.
There are two variations to the straight checklist method. One variation is the forced choice technique. In this approach, the appraiser reviews a series of statements about an employee’s performance and indicates which statement is most descriptive or least descriptive of that individual’s performance. After the checklist is completed, the
evaluator reviews all of the behaviors checked and composes a written description of the employee’s performance. A second variation of the checklist is the weighted checklist. It is very similar to the forced choice method except that weights have been assigned to each possible response. Normally the weights, developed by the human resource
group, are not known to the evaluator. This approach, it is believed, tends to reduce bias on the part of the person conducting the appraisal.